Home / Registry / Record
Publishing rights & compliance · Illustrative record

Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now

Technology & Society · Publication and program dossier

By Jaron Lanier

Master file reference · illustrativeGPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Cover of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier
Representative publication · edition may varyFind this edition ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Illustrative case statusRegistration DeclinedScenario review date · 6 July 2018
09Program records
39Review controls
23Open items

Master case overview

Master file reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Illustrative status
Registration Declined
Author / reference identity
Jaron Lanier
Subject area
Technology & Society
Work
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now
Review focus
Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.
Proposed formats · scenario
Print, ebook and audiobook
Proposed market scope · scenario
English-language release; foreign editions subject to separate review
Book release date
29 May 2018
Open Library ↗
Registration date · illustrative
5 June 2018
Publication and registration basis
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now: Earliest dated catalog edition in the recorded first-publication year; editions may vary. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.
Modeled review date
6 July 2018
Source basis
Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 9 program records, 39 review controls and 23 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Submission reviewed and rejected

A completion package was submitted and reviewed in this scenario. Rejected documents show the review reason; completed items remain recorded, but the registration was declined.

16 / 39 completed
DPCPRegistration Declined

Data, Privacy & Consent in Published Content Review

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-DPCP

Review scope: personal-data inventory, use and consent basis, minimization.

5 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,600

View review details ↓
AICPRegistration Declined

AI-Assisted Content Disclosure & Provenance Record

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-AICP

Review scope: content provenance, human review, input rights.

5 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,200

View review details ↓
NDISRegistration Declined

News, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-NDIS

Review scope: source provenance, confidentiality handling, corroboration plan.

5 review controls4 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,400

View review details ↓
FCRSRegistration Declined

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-FCRS

Review scope: claim inventory, source traceability, context and limitations.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,000

View review details ↓
PDTCRegistration Declined

Platform Distribution & Terms Compliance

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-PDTC

Review scope: platform scope, terms mapping, access and files.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,600

View review details ↓
IDLCRegistration Declined

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IDLC

Review scope: agreement inventory, license boundaries, accounting and reporting.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,200

View review details ↓
IRTCRegistration Declined

International Rights & Territory Control File

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IRTC

Review scope: chain of title, edition history, quotation permissions.

4 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,400

View review details ↓
CAVRRegistration Declined

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-CAVR

Review scope: visual asset provenance, designer permissions, credit requirements.

3 review controls1 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,000

View review details ↓
IBEMRegistration Declined

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IBEM

Review scope: protected assets, authorized channels, monitoring exclusions.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,600

View review details ↓
DPCP · Illustrative program record

Data, Privacy & Consent in Published Content Review

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-DPCP
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
3 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. DPCP-101

    Personal-data inventory

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify any personal information proposed for reproduction. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  2. DPCP-102

    Use and consent basis

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, document the proposed basis and scope for identifiable case-study material. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. DPCP-103

    Minimization

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, consider whether unnecessary identifying details can be removed. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  4. DPCP-104

    Access controls

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, separate public material from restricted review records. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  5. DPCP-105

    Retention scope

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, define retention and deletion rules for review copies. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

Submission results 5

  • Personal-data inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: DPCP-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Consent and use-basis checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: DPCP-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Minimization and redaction worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: DPCP-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Review access planRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: DPCP-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Retention scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: DPCP-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

AICP · Illustrative program record

AI-Assisted Content Disclosure & Provenance Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-AICP
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
3 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. AICP-101

    Content provenance

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify whether any proposed publication assets use generated material. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  2. AICP-102

    Human review

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, define responsibility for checking any generated passages or visual assets. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. AICP-103

    Input rights

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, document permission boundaries for inputs used in proposed generation workflows. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  4. AICP-104

    Reader disclosure

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, draft proportionate disclosure for any applicable generated contribution. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  5. AICP-105

    Version history

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, track edited outputs and the responsible human reviewer. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

Submission results 5

  • AI-use declaration checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: AICP-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Human review protocolCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: AICP-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Input provenance registerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: AICP-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • AI contribution disclosure sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: AICP-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Generation and revision logRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: AICP-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

NDIS · Illustrative program record

News, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-NDIS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
1 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. NDIS-101

    Source provenance

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, trace research inputs to their origin and document verification limits. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  2. NDIS-102

    Confidentiality handling

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, separate public references from material requiring restricted access. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  3. NDIS-103

    Corroboration plan

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify which claims would need independent corroboration. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  4. NDIS-104

    Interview permission

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, document the scope of any proposed interview reuse. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  5. NDIS-105

    Redaction control

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, define version controls for any required redactions. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

Submission results 5

  • Source provenance registerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: NDIS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Source handling matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: NDIS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Corroboration worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: NDIS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Interview permission checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: NDIS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Redaction and access logRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: NDIS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

FCRS · Illustrative program record

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-FCRS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. FCRS-101

    Claim inventory

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, classify factual, historical and statistical claims selected for the review scope. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  2. FCRS-102

    Source traceability

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  3. FCRS-103

    Context and limitations

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  4. FCRS-104

    Data reproduction

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  5. FCRS-105

    Correction control

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 5

  • Claim-to-source ledgerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: FCRS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Source bibliography and locator indexRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Claim qualification scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Statistical reproduction worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Correction and version logCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

PDTC · Illustrative program record

Platform Distribution & Terms Compliance

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-PDTC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. PDTC-101

    Platform scope

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify target platforms and the formats proposed for delivery. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  2. PDTC-102

    Terms mapping

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, map the proposed release against documented platform requirements. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  3. PDTC-104

    Access and files

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, specify file validation and accessibility checks before delivery. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  4. PDTC-105

    Change handling

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, assign responsibility for updates, corrections and withdrawal requests. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 4

  • Platform delivery matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: PDTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Platform requirements checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: PDTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Digital file validation checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: PDTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Platform change-control planCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: PDTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IDLC · Illustrative program record

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IDLC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. IDLC-101

    Agreement inventory

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  2. IDLC-102

    License boundaries

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. IDLC-104

    Accounting and reporting

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  4. IDLC-105

    Termination controls

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

Submission results 4

  • Distribution agreement inventoryRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Distribution license matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Royalty and reporting scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Termination and reversion checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IRTC · Illustrative program record

International Rights & Territory Control File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IRTC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
2 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. IRTC-101

    Chain of title

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  2. IRTC-103

    Edition history

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. IRTC-104

    Quotation permissions

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  4. IRTC-105

    Reversion and reservations

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 4

  • Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Edition and rights chronologyCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Third-party permissions registerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

CAVR · Illustrative program record

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-CAVR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
2 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 3

  1. CAVR-101

    Visual asset provenance

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  2. CAVR-102

    Designer permissions

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, separate designer deliverables from third-party stock and font licenses. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  3. CAVR-104

    Credit requirements

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, record mandatory image credits and license conditions. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 3

  • Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Designer and supplier rights checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: CAVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Visual credit-line sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: CAVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IBEM · Illustrative program record

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686-IBEM
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2018-JL-192686
Review scope
Print, ebook and audiobook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier · Technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. IBEM-101

    Protected assets

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, separate protectable text and artwork from third-party names and lawful references. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  2. IBEM-102

    Authorized channels

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, distinguish approved editions and sellers from items that need verification. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  3. IBEM-103

    Monitoring exclusions

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, exclude commentary, criticism and other lawful references from proposed monitoring. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  4. IBEM-105

    Notice readiness

    For the proposed scope of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, specify evidence capture and rights-holder approval before any proposed notice. Apply this check in the context of technology terminology, data provenance and time-sensitive technical claims.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 4

  • Protected asset inventoryRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: IBEM-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Authorized edition and channel registerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: IBEM-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Monitoring keyword and exclusion planRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: IBEM-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
  • Evidence capture and escalation protocolCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IBEM-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2018 · reviewed 6 July 2018 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Control referenceDocument requirementScenario state
DPCP-101Personal-data inventoryCompleted · submitted and reviewed
DPCP-102Consent and use-basis checklistCompleted · submitted and reviewed
DPCP-103Minimization and redaction worksheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
DPCP-104Review access planRejected · submitted and reviewed
DPCP-105Retention scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
AICP-101AI-use declaration checklistCompleted · submitted and reviewed
AICP-102Human review protocolCompleted · submitted and reviewed
AICP-103Input provenance registerRejected · submitted and reviewed
AICP-104AI contribution disclosure sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
AICP-105Generation and revision logRejected · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-101Source provenance registerRejected · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-102Source handling matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-103Corroboration worksheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-104Interview permission checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-105Redaction and access logRejected · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-101Claim-to-source ledgerRejected · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-102Source bibliography and locator indexRejected · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-103Claim qualification scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-104Statistical reproduction worksheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-105Correction and version logCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PDTC-101Platform delivery matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
PDTC-102Platform requirements checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
PDTC-104Digital file validation checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
PDTC-105Platform change-control planCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-101Distribution agreement inventoryRejected · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-102Distribution license matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-104Royalty and reporting scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-105Termination and reversion checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-101Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-103Edition and rights chronologyCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-104Third-party permissions registerRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-105Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-101Cover and artwork provenance registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-102Designer and supplier rights checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-104Visual credit-line sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-101Protected asset inventoryRejected · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-102Authorized edition and channel registerRejected · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-103Monitoring keyword and exclusion planRejected · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-105Evidence capture and escalation protocolCompleted · submitted and reviewed

Consolidated program status

ProgramIllustrative statusOpen itemsNext action
DPCPRegistration Declined2Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
AICPRegistration Declined2Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
NDISRegistration Declined4Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
FCRSRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
PDTCRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IDLCRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IRTCRegistration Declined2Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
CAVRRegistration Declined1Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IBEMRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Scenario dateModeled milestone
5 June 2018Registration modeled
10 June 2018Evidence package submitted · scenario
22 June 2018Submitted evidence reviewed · scenario
6 July 2018Submission rejected; registration declined · scenario

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 9 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

ProgramProgram nameAllocated fee (USD)
DPCPData, Privacy & Consent in Published Content Review$3,600
AICPAI-Assisted Content Disclosure & Provenance Record$4,200
NDISNews, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity$2,400
FCRSFact-Checking & Research Substantiation File$3,000
PDTCPlatform Distribution & Terms Compliance$3,600
IDLCInternational Distribution & Licensing Compliance File$4,200
IRTCInternational Rights & Territory Control File$2,400
CAVRCover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record$3,000
IBEMInternational Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File$3,600

Total illustrative fees · USD$30,000

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

  1. Identify the requirements remaining unresolved at the modeled decision stage.
  2. Consult the applicable notice and review process before proposing a further submission.
  3. Prepare a response addressing each unresolved control; a fee or revised document alone would not guarantee approval.

This sequence describes the modeled registration declined workflow only.

Record statements

Illustrative scope. The author and publication identify a library entry. Review details and registration milestones are synthetic; book publication dates are sourced; the page makes no claim that the author applied, supplied evidence, paid fees or received a determination.

Program references. GPRCC-ILL identifiers label scenarios, not statutory registrations. Document states and allocated fees are not proof of review or payment.

Publication context. The modeled status makes no finding about the publication’s legality, accuracy, ownership or suitability. Real determinations require a submitted record and an authorized review.

Author Case Library